Pink Tax: Why Women often Pay More
- Financial Literacy Cell
- Jul 5
- 4 min read
Introduction
Imagine you are walking into a supermarket. You need a razor. You walk into the men’s personal care and see a standard blue or black razor with ₨ 50, and suddenly you notice in women’s personal care the functionally same type of razor is tagged with Rs 70, but its color is pink. So what is special about that razor that increases the price?
Welcome to the Pink Tax!
It is not like government direct or indirect taxes like GST. It is an invisible, insidious tax imposed by corporations. The logic behind hike prices is women's accessories are pink, perfumed, or shrunk.
For a metropolitan woman, it might seem less concerning, but for us as students or young professionals who are starting their investment journey, these small differences may make a huge difference. At Vittshala, we believe in looking at the compound interest of every financial decision. And the Pink Tax? It’s compounding against you.
What Exactly Is the Pink Tax?
The Pink Tax refers to the gender-based price disparity where products and services marketed to women cost significantly more than identical versions marketed to men.
Before moving ahead in the blog, it is important to clarify that it is not a luxury tax.
It is a tax imposed on daily basic necessities of women.
The Numbers: A Global and Indian Reality
While writing the blog, I went through different research papers and articles. I noticed the pink tax is not limited to India; the developed nations are also in the grip of this. However, the situation in India is arguably more complex due to our price-sensitive market.
Have a look at the data to understand the roots of the pink tax.
Personal Care: Women’s deodorants, shampoos, and creams are often priced 10-20% higher than men’s, despite containing nearly identical active ingredients.
Salon Services: This is the most visible sector. A normal haircut service in a metropolitan city may charge up to 200-500, while for a simple trim of women's hair, its price is surprisingly doubled.
Apparel: Generally women’s clothes fabric is thinner than the men’s and leads to frequent replacement. Also, lack of functional pockets forces the purchase of handbags—a secondary accessory men rarely need to buy.
The Economics Behind the Price Tag
As finance students, we must ask: Why does this arbitrage exist? Is it just corporate greed, or is there economic logic?
1. Price Elasticity of Demand
Economists argue that women have less elasticity for grooming and personal care products. In Indian society it is often forced that the women should look like this or should try to look pretty. Often it is mentioned in our cultural textbooks, and many books are written on women’s beauty. It’s contradictory, but I feel the corporations take benefits from this societal pressure. Even a poor family who can’t afford it has to follow it at the time of marriage. This is called the bandwagon effect.
2. Product Differentiation vs. Discrimination
Brands often argue that women's products need more R&D. It contains scents, molds, and other specifications. It is absolutely correct, but it’s a one-time cost. Also, a calculator, a helmet, or a basic razor blade has no biological gender. When a manufacturer charges more in some circumstances, that is not differentiation; it is discrimination.
Pink Tax vs. Tampon Tax: Know the Difference
Pink Tax: Gender-based discriminatory prices charged by corporations.
Tampon Tax: Imposed by the government on menstrual hygiene products, treating them as luxury items rather than necessities.
In India also 12% GST was charged by the government on sanitary pads and other menstrual hygiene products. In 2018, the Indian government scrapped the GST from the same. However, the pink tax (corporate pricing) is still unregulated. There are no laws of equality here as mentioned in Article 14 of the constitution. Women are still paying more for the same face wash that men have to pay less for.
The "Vittshala" Calculation: The Lifetime Cost
In India, where income gaps, unpaid care work, and gendered expectations already place women at a disadvantage, the pink tax quietly compounds inequality. As young professionals or college students, we are entirely dependent on our pocket money or savings. So even a piddling amount of savings can help us to compound our investment.
Let’s take a hypothetical estimation for an average Indian woman living in a metro city:
Personal Care (Shampoo, Face Wash, Razor): +₹150
Dry Cleaning/Services: +₹200
Apparel/Accessories markup: +₹300
Total Monthly Pink Tax: ~₹650
It’s not like much, but let’s apply the Rule of Compounding.
If a Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) of Rs 650 per month is invested in a NIFTY 50 Index, assuming a conservative 12% ROI.
In 10 years: ~₹1.5 Lakhs
In 20 years: ~₹6.5 Lakhs
In 30 years: ~₹23 Lakhs
That is the hidden cost of being a woman. It is gradually costing your pocket money. You can create a good corpus out of it. This is a massive leak in the financial bucket of half the population.
The Psychological Trap: "Shrink It and Pink It"
Marketing psychology plays an important role here. You might have noticed that brands have become successful in creating the belief that "men's products are for utility" and "women's products are for experience."
Men's Marketing: Focuses on durability, strength, and value ("Buy 1 Get 1," "Extra Strong"). e.g., Lifebuoy
Women's Marketing: Focuses on emotion, beauty, and luxury ("Silky Smooth," "Radiant"). e.g., Santoor, Lux
Through this type of ad, brands create a sense of premium feeling in women. So they are charging extra not for function but for feeling.
How to "Hack" the Pink Tax: A Consumer’s Guide
We can’t wait for legislation to catch up. We can take simple steps at the individual level to beat the pink tax. Let's crack it.
The "Men’s Aisle" Hack
For generic items, cross the aisle.
Razors— sharper, more durable, and cheaper
Deodorants— unscented or neutral deodorants
Basic Apparel— Hoodies, t-shirts
2. Check the Ingredients, Not the Packaging
Turn the bottle around. Check the ingredients. Buy the generic or unisex version (e.g., Cetaphil or pharmacy brands) rather than the "For Her" hyper-branded versions.
3. Support Gender-Neutral Brands
4. Invest the Difference
Conclusion: The Price of Equality
The pink tax represents a quiet but persistent cost of being a woman. As concerned and vittshala blog readers, we know that in perfect competition there is no single individual who sets the price of products. Recognizing the pink tax is the first step toward dismantling it. We can raise our voice. We can unite and force the corporations to kneel down to this type of gender-based price discrimination.




Comments